The extraordinary gender gap at the heart of a nail-biting US election
Gender is shaping up to be a key dividing line in almost every battleground state.
Donald Trump has proudly told an all-female audience at a town hall in Georgia that he is “the father of IVF”, as he strives to close the gender gap in an otherwise razor-tight election race.
While the impending US election is shaping up to be one of the closest contests in modern history, Donald Trump has a woman problem. Though, for that matter, Kamala Harris has one with men.
According to a recent Pew Research Center poll, 51% of male registered voters support Trump, and 43% support Harris. Among female registered voters, that is effectively reversed: 52% of female registered voters support Harris, while 43% support Trump.
Sarah Longwell, executive director of Republican Voters Against Trump, told the WSJ this week that 2024 is the most gendered election she has ever seen.
Bar Arizona, this pattern is coming to the fore in every key battleground state. In Georgia, for instance, Harris is enjoying a 12-point lead among women, while Trump boasts a 14-point lead among men.
Why would an endorsement of IVF help Trump to repair his deficit among female voters?
A new poll by NBC provides a clue. When those surveyed were asked if there was “any one issue so important that you would vote for or against a candidate solely on that basis”, the top answer - on 22 per cent - was "abortion". Harris was given a 19-point lead on her perceived ability to handle this issue well.
Trump - who supports state abortion bans, albeit lukewarmly - knows that Harris’s vocal support for abortion rights is a major obstacle to him closing the gender gap. So loudly declaring his support for IVF is an attempt to stop her presenting as the only candidate advocating for any form of reproductive rights.
Back in February, Alabama’s state supreme court ruled that frozen embryos created through fertility treatment are “unborn children” and that a person could be held liable for accidentally destroying them. The controversial ruling opened up a new front in the battle over reproductive health. And IVF - like abortion - is supported by the majority of Americans.
As a result, Trump has made efforts to demonstrate his support for IVF, going even further than the Democrats in pledging to make the procedure free for all Americans.
Harris has reacted with furry to her opponents' bold claim today. "Donald Trump called himself 'the father of IVF.' What is he talking about? His abortion bans have already jeopardised access to it in states across the country—and his own platform could end IVF altogether."
Harris needn’t worry too much. It seems unlikely that Trump will steal too many of her voters by recasting himself as the “reproductive rights” candidate. The much bigger challenge for her will be to shore up support amongst men.
Her recent targeted ad - featuring a series of hyper-masculine men who “eat carburetors for breakfast" and are “man enough” to vote for a women - fell flat. Some critics even labelled it one of the cringiest political ads in US history.
But she is pressing on. On Monday, Harris rolled out an “opportunity agenda” for Black men, including business loans, job training and health initiatives and yesterday she did a interview with radio host Charlamagne tha God, who is especially popular amongst young men.
One statistic that could make the Harris campaign feel a little hopeful: in every US presidential election dating back to 1984, women have turned out to vote at slightly higher rates than men.
Caitlin Allen
Deputy Editor
ON REACTION TODAY
Gerald Warner
Alex Salmond: a clever career but a toxic legacy
ALSO KNOW
Good news on inflation - The rate of UK inflation fell to 1.7% in September, in an unexpected move which is below the Bank of England’s 2% target and the lowest since mid-2021. Cheaper petrol prices and airline fares were a key reason for the better-than-expected fall, according to the Office for National Statistics. The data only further increases speculation that the Bank of England will cut interest rates (currently at 5%) in November.
Lebanon latest - An Israeli airstrike on a municipal building in Nabatieh, a provisional capital in South Lebanon, has reportedly killed at least 6 people including the mayor of the town as they gathered to organise the distribution of aid to those affected by the conflict. The death of Mayor Ahmed Kahil, who said he would not leave following an Israeli evacuation notice on 3 October, comes as the IDF expands its operations in Lebanon.
Lammy heads to China - Foreign Secretary David Lammy is planning to visit Beijing and Shanghai this week in the highest-level trip by British officials to China since Labour came into government in July. The state visit, which has been presented as a chance to “reset ties” with China, comes amidst fears that Beijing-sponsored hackers have compromised British critical infrastructure only a week after MI5 Director-General Ken McCallum warned that the UK faces “the most complex threat environment we have ever seen”.
IRGC escape proscription - Number 10 is set to decide against designating Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist group despite the Labour party urging the previous Conservative government to take such a step when it was in opposition. The decision was reportedly taken in part due to fears that the largely symbolic move, given that the IRGC is already sanctioned by the Britain government, would lead Tehran to expel UK diplomats from the country. As one Foreign Office official told Politico: “At a time when Iran is causing such danger in the world, I want an embassy in Tehran”.
FIVE THINGS
Curated by the Reaction Team - Gabriel Lane
1. The Meloni effect: how the Italian Prime Minister could reshape European politics. Francesco Giubilei in The Critic.
2. Ozempic has exposed the grift behind the public-health lobby, writes Christopher Snowdon in Spiked.
3. Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal on the Guru who says he can get your 11-year-old into Harvard.
4. How scientists started to decode birdsong. Rivka Galchen in The New Yorker.
5. Anyone can turn you into an AI chatbot, and there’s little you can do to stop them, write Megan Farokhmanesh and Lauren Goode in WIRED.